The socialized medicine scheme proposed in the
house and senate either avoids the argument regarding
selling insurance across state lines or nullifies the
benefits of selling insurance across state lines. (1)
What does selling insurance across state lines
mean? Why don't insurers presently sell insurance
across state lines? Why should insurers sell insurance
across state lines? Are the many and several states
proposing legislation regarding selling insurance
across state lines?
What does selling insurance across
state lines mean?
Basically selling insurance across state lines
means that insurance regulated in one state could be
purchased in another state which has separate
insurance regulations. (2) That a citizen of New York
could buy a policy that is regulated by the state of
Arkansas.
Why don't insurers presently sell insurance
across state lines?
The states retain certain rights based in the
10th Amendment. Insurance is one of those
retained rights. (3) (4) (5) (6) Hence insurance is
regulated on a state by state basis. Furthermore, the
fifty states have differing insurance laws and
regulations with each state having a separate
insurance commissioner that enforces the insurance
laws and regulations of each state.
An insurance company can sell policies in multiple
states, however the insurer must license itself
separately in each state that it wants to market its
product. (7) The separate licensing in each state is
required as each state has differing insurance laws
and mandates. Hence the insurance policy sold in
Nevada by XYZ insurance company is
different that the insurance policy sold by XYZ insurance company in Florida.
Therefore, a policy form that meets the insurance laws
and mandates of Florida can't be sold in Nevada as the
policy form does not meet the insurance laws and
mandates of Nevada.
However, its very important to note that basic
policy coverage and basic policy
language generally do not differ widely from
state to state. Why? One reason is the New York State
Insurance Department. New York created the model for
many policies. (8) For example, New York created the
model coverage and language associated with the
standard fire policy. They also created the model
coverage and language for the personal auto policy
(PAP). These models created by New York can be found
adopted by many states. Hence the many states adopt
insurance coverage, laws, and regulation that work in
another state. Another reason basic policy
coverage and language do not differ widely
between the states is that the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners propose and adopt many model
regulations that then go onto be adopted by many
states. (9)
Insurance law and regulation is a retained state
right per the 10th Amendment.
Currently insurance is not sold across state lines due
to the conflict of insurance laws and mandated
coverage of one particular state in regards to another
particular state.
Why should health insurance be sold across
state lines?
The idea of selling health insurance across state
lines is not a new idea. The idea can be traced back
to a 2005 proposal by Representative John Shadegg of Arizona. (10)
One of many items that drive up cost in health care
and consequently health insurance are state mandates.
(11) State mandates basically broaden coverage beyond
the basic intended coverage under an insurance policy
form.
As mentioned above basic coverage afforded
by an insurance policy form is rather constant in the
fifty states. That is to say, the basic language of a
major medical policy does not vary widely. However,
state mandated coverage varies widely. Currently 1,823
mandates exist among the several and many states. (12)
The state with the most mandates is Minnesota with 62
mandates and the state with the least mandates is
Idaho with 13.
What is a mandated coverage that broadens basic
coverage? Examples of mandated coverage vary by state
but several examples are hair transplants,
acupuncture, massage therapy, in vitro fertilization, morbid obesity, and
smoking cessation . (13) (14) Its estimated that
mandated coverage increases the cost of insurance by
5%. However, the 5% cost increase associated with
mandates does not reflect insurers having to
administer varying policy forms to adhere to the 1,823
differing mandates across the several and many states.
Hence one could clearly add a conservative estimate of
an addition 2% onto the above 5% figure for
administrative expense to comply with policy forms
that vary i.e. administration of 1,843 mandates.
The mandated coverage also drives out insurers and
hence competition within particular states. (15) The
more and stricter the mandates, the fewer insurers
that want to provide insurance. For example, New
Jersey with many mandates and strict mandates only has
a handful of insurers willing to participate. Hence
the mandates create insurance oligopolies offering
coverage rather than a wide spectrum of insurers
competing in a free market.
Given the discussion of mandates above, the selling
insurance across state lines proposition is about
freedom to choose leading to the consumer finding
affordable coverage to fit individual needs. For
example, say an individual in New Jersey wants to buy
a basic health insurance policy given a fixed dollar
budget. The individual is faced with a staggering cost
for health insurance in New Jersey. However, if the
same individual could buy a basic health insurance
policy based on coverage and mandates of the state of
Kentucky he/she could buy the coverage at a fraction
of the price. (16) In other words, the competition
among the states, giving the consumer the opportunity
to match coverage and mandates that fit their needs
and budget, reduces cost.
What are states doing about selling across
state lines?
The answer to what states are doing regarding
selling insurance across state lines comes in two
parts: actual legislation to allow purchases across
state lines and the blocking of the federal government
to require citizens of the several and many states to
purchase insurance on a mandatory basis.
Legislators in the state of Georgia are currently
considering a proposal to allow citizens of Georgia to
purchase insurance across state lines. (17) Further,
twenty eight states have proposed legislation known
as "health care nullification legislation". The
legislation effectively nullifies any future national
health care plan within their borders and/or makes it
illegal to require state citizens to purchase health
insurance. One state, Arizona, has already passed a
nullification law while a nullification law has passed
the Senate of the state of Virginia. (18)(19)
Summary
Selling insurance across state lines allows
citizens more freedom of choice in health insurance
purchases resulting a very conservative estimate of a
7% reduction in cost. Presently health insurance is
not sold across state lines as insurance is state by
state regulated with differing insurance laws and
mandated coverage. The many and several states are
seriously looking at ways to sell across state lines
and legislation is being proposed and discussed.
Notes Note: if you would like to see what
health insurance mandates exist in your particular
state, as of 2008, please go to the following link
which is a very comprehensive list of mandates for the
fifty states:
http://www.cahi.org/cahi_
contents/resources/pdf/HealthInsuranceMandates2008.pdf<
/a>
Note: the 7% price reduction
mentioned above may seem insignificant. However this
7% reduction is only part of the puzzle. When the
puzzle pieces of health savings accounts, tort reform,
allowing individuals to buy insurance with pretax
dollars, and selling insurance across state lines are
added together major price reductions are
achieved.
References:
(1)
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2009/November/0
6/health-insurance-across-state-lines.aspx
(2)
http://www.insurancecompanyrules.org/blog/entry/gop_hea
lth_reform_bill_more_shifts_costs_to_you/
(3)http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/the-10th-
amendment-movement/
(4)
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/nullification/healt
h-care/
(5)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States'_rights
(6)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_Uni
ted_States_Constitution
(7)
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2009/November/0
6/health-insurance-across-state-lines.aspx
(8) http://www.answers.com/topic/new-york-standard-
fire-policy
(9)http://www.naic.org/
(10)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550604
574360923109310680.html
(11)
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2009/November/0
6/health-insurance-across-state-lines.aspx
(12)
http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results/16867/Analys
is_State_Mandates_Drive_Up_Insurance_Costs.html
(13)
http://wonkroom.thinkprogressive.org/2008/10/15/conserv
ative-mandates/
(14)
http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results/16867/Analys
is_State_Mandates_Drive_Up_Insurance_Costs.html
http://bytestyle.tv/content/state-mandates-health-
insurance-find-out-what-youre-paying-and-dont-need
(15) http://localhealthguideonline.com/the-debate-
over-
selling-insurance-across-state-lines/
(16)http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/08/competition-
cure.html
(17) http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2010/jan/22/int
erstate-insurance-sales-considered-by/
(18)
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/nullification/healt
h-care/
(19)http://www.qando.net/?p=6911
|